Re: pgsql: doc: remove verbiage about "receiving" data from rep. slots
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgsql: doc: remove verbiage about "receiving" data from rep. slots |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | pexmenhqptw5h4ma4qasz3cvjtynivxprqifgghdjtmkxdig2g@djg7bk2p6pts обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgsql: doc: remove verbiage about "receiving" data from rep. slots (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgsql: doc: remove verbiage about "receiving" data from rep. slots
|
| Список | pgsql-committers |
Hi, On 2025-11-14 09:12:33 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 09:05:07AM -0500, Andres Freund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2025-11-14 09:02:12 -0500, Andres Freund wrote: > > > On 2025-11-14 13:56:06 +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > doc: remove verbiage about "receiving" data from rep. slots > > > > > > > > The slots are just LSN markers, not something to receive from. > > > > > > I think this is wrong. Logical slots also preserve resources other than WAL. > > > > I also think that the complaint about slots not being something to receive > > from is simply wrong for logical slots. > > Uh, can you clarify since I can't find details on what they preserve. Slots (physical ones can, logical ones always do), prevent row cleanup on the primary. > The reason I liked the new wording is that the slot is only a small part > of the receiving path. Almost by definition, the slot is specified as > _part_ of the connection parameter --- it is not the connection > parameter. I don't know what that has to do with anything. > Can you think of better wording that would be clearer than what we had? I don't see any need to revise the wording of the changed sections. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: