Re: [JDBC] Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?
От | Thomas Kellerer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [JDBC] Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | oti79d$ivs$1@blaine.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [JDBC] Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10? ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
David G. Johnston schrieb am 03.11.2017 um 15:19: > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net <mailto:spam_eater@gmx.net>>wrote: > > The Postgres JDBC driver offers a way to specify multiple hosts in the connection URL: > > https://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/head/connect.html#connection-failover > > However, it is unclear to me if that feature relies on the libpq feature introduced in Postgres 10: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-connect.html#libpq-multiple-hosts > > or if this is handled by the driver internally? > > > In short, it is handled by the driver internally. > > There is no server support (which make sense given failure to connect > would preclude the presence of a server) in the libpq implementation > of this behavior - i.e., its not a protocol thing but a client > implementation. The JDBC driver does not utilize libpq at all, it > directly implements the PostgreSQL communication protocol. > > David J. Thanks, apparently I mis-read the release notes -- Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: