Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
| От | Pierre Frédéric Caillaud |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | op.u6ne9gowcke6l8@soyouz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? ("fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
> I've changed the setting a bit:
>
> (1) Replaced 7.200 disk by a 10.000 one, still sata though.
>
> (2) Inserting rows only 10x times (instead of 100x times)
> but 80mb each, so having the same amount of 800mb in total.
>
> (3) Changed the WAL path to the system disk (by the
> great 'junction' trick mentioned in the other posting), so
> actually splitting the write access to the "system" disk and
> the fast "data" disk.
>
>
>
> And here is the frustrating result:
>
> 1. None of the 4 CPUs was ever more busy than 30% (never
> less idle than 70%),
>
> 2. while both disks kept being far below the average write
> performance: the "data" disk had 18 peaks of approx. 40 mb
> but in total the average thoughput was 16-18 mb/s.
>
>
> BTW:
>
> * Disabling noatime and similar for ntfs did not change
> things much (thanks though!).
>
> * A short cross check copying 800mb random data file from
> "system" to "data" disk showed a performance of constantly
> 75 mb/s.
>
>
> So, I have no idea what remains as the bottleneck.
>
> Felix
Try this :
CREATE TABLE test AS SELECT * FROM yourtable;
This will test write speed, and TOAST compression speed.
Then try this:
CREATE TABLE test (LIKE yourtable);
COMMIT;
INSERT INTO test SELECT * FROM yourtable;
This does the same thing but also writes WAL.
I wonder what results you'll get.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: