Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
От
Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
Тема
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
Дата
Msg-id
op.u6i5s9eicke6l8@soyouz
Ответ на
Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? (fkater@googlemail.com)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "Fernando Hevia" <fhevia@ip-tel.com.ar>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Pierre Frédéric Caillaud<lists@peufeu.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Dave Crooke <dcrooke@gmail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Pierre Frédéric Caillaud<lists@peufeu.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Pierre Frédéric Caillaud<lists@peufeu.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Pierre Frédéric Caillaud<lists@peufeu.com>
> However the harddisk (sata) could write 43 MB/s in the worst > case! Why is write performance limited to 16 MB/s? > > Some more hints what I do: > > I use PQexecParams() and the INSERT ... $001 notation to NOT > create a real escapted string from the data additionally but > use a pointer to the 8MB data buffer. > > I altered the binary column to STORAGE EXTERNAL. > > Some experiments with postgresql.conf (fsync off, > shared_buffers=1000MB, checkpoint_segments=256) did not > change the 50s- much (somtimes 60s sometimes a little less). > > 4 Core CPU 3 Ghz, WinXP, 1 TB SATA disk. Big CPU and slow disk... You should add another disk just for the WAL -- disks are pretty cheap these days. Writing the WAL on a second disk is the first thing to do on a configuration like yours, if you are limited by writes. It also reduces the fsync lag a lot since the disk is only doing WAL.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
От: Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
Дата: