Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
От | Ivan Voras |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | hj46di$9bi$1@ger.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? ("fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 01/19/10 11:16, fkater@googlemail.com wrote: > fkater@googlemail.com: > >> I'll try to execute these tests on a SSD >> and/or Raid system. > > FYI: > > On a sata raid-0 (mid range hardware) and recent 2x 1.5 TB > disks with a write performance of 100 MB/s (worst, to 200 > MB/s max), I get a performance of 18.2 MB/s. Before, with > other disk 43 MB/s (worst to 70 MB/s max) postgres came to > 14-16 MB/s. [I just skimmed this thread - did you increase the number of WAL logs to something very large, like 128?] > So, I conclude finally: > > (1) Postgresql write throughput (slowly) scales with the > harddisk speed. > > (2) The throughput (not counting WAL doubling data) in > postgresql is 20-25% of the disk thoughput. And this is one of the more often forgot reasons why storing large objects in a database rather than in the file systems is a bad idea :)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: