Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 10 Beta1 - pg_upgrade fails on Windows 10
От | Thomas Kellerer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 10 Beta1 - pg_upgrade fails on Windows 10 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | oga8gi$g6h$1@blaine.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 10 Beta1 - pg_upgrade fails on Windows 10 (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 10 Beta1 - pg_upgrade fails on Windows 10
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver schrieb am 26.05.2017 um 23:16: >>>>> could not load library "$libdir/pgxml": >>>>> ERROR: could not load library "d:/etc/postgres-10/pgsql/lib/postgresql/pgxml.dll": unknown error 126 >>>> >>>> Apparently BigSQL forgot to include contrib/xml2 in their distribution; >>>> you should ping them about that one. >>> >>> I wasn't sure where the problem is, I will report this to BigSQL as well. >>> >>> However, the xml2 extension is included. The extension control file as well as libxml2-2.dll. >> >> But the error message is looking for pgxml.dll, not libxml2-2.dll. >> Those are clearly different files. > > Well Thomas is using pg_upgrade from a BigSQL 10beta1 install to > upgrade from a 9.6 instance of unknown provenance. pg_upgrade is > complaining that the 9.6 cluster has pgxml.dll whereas the 10beta1 > cluster does not even though xml2 is installed on both clusters. The > question is this a packaging oops on the part of BigSQL or something > else? Interesting enough, the same error message appears when I run "create extension xml2;" on Postgres 10. It somehow looks as if there is a DLL dependency between XML2 and whatever uses pgxml.dll (the new xmltable perhaps?) > from a 9.6 instance of unknown provenance The 9.6 installation is a 9.6.2 binary from EnterpriseDB (unfortunately they don't supply the beta binaries, otherwise Iwould have used those) Thomas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: