[JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables
От | Thomas Kellerer |
---|---|
Тема | [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | of6pgu$7kb$1@blaine.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables
Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
The current JDBC driver returns no information about the new partitioned tables in the upcoming Postgres 10. This is caused by the fact that partitioned tables have a new pg_class.relkind value: 'p' I have attached a simple patch that fixes the obvious problem that partitioned tables are not returned by getTables() andno column information is returned from getColumns(). The patch essentially treats relkind 'r' and 'p' the same because I think the driver should not make a distinction betweenregular tables and partitioned tables. But I think the bigger is: what do do with the partitions themselves? Technically they are tables, but I think it would make sense to hide them and let frontend tools deal with displaying partitionsbelonging to a table (this is e.g. how Oracle does it). However, psql displays them as regular tables just like with the "old" inheritance partitions, so that would probably causesome confusion if getTables() did not return those tables. Thomas
Вложения
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: