Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
От | Manfred Koizar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | mrf5pukio3cmn8dhps6uc584o1tu3b50jf@4ax.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:40:03 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: >Item 3 is the most controversial. Some say sum all tuple counts, i.e. >sum INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE. That just seems to messy to me. I think >summing only the matching tags has the highest probability of returning >a meaningful number. [Trying to keep it short this time] I still believe that there is more than one correct answer; it just depends on what the dba intends. So I proposed a syntax change for letting the dba explicitly mark the statements she/he wants to affect tuple count and oid. -> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-09/msg00720.php Unfortunately I tried to summarize all other proposals and the mail got so long that nobody read it to the end :-( ServusManfred
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: