Re: [SUMMARY] Re: New acinclude.m4
От | blacknoz@club-internet.fr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SUMMARY] Re: New acinclude.m4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | mnet1.1116572371.4400.blacknoz@club-internet.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [SUMMARY] Re: New acinclude.m4 (Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz@club-internet.fr>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
----Message d'origine---- >Copie à: "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org>, >De: "Adam H.Pendleton" <fmonkey@fmonkey.net> >Sujet: Re: [SUMMARY] Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New acinclude.m4 >Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:44:44 -0400 >A: Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz@club-internet.fr> > > >On May 19, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote: > >> To summarize : >> - we reject the configure.ac.patch which removed ENABLE_STATIC and >> should not have been included in trunk yet > >You mean reject my entire patch? It did much more than just remove >ENABLE_STATIC, so it should not be rejected. Oh no! Your patch is _really_ fine and it does not remove ENABLE_STATIC from configure.ac! I meant to just reject the firstone I sent yesterday evening concerning ENABLE_STATIC removal in configure.ac, not acinclude.m4. >> - we keep the latest "acinclude_static.patch" which re-add support for >> pg_static_build=yes + takes care of systems where wxWid installations >> are both static & dynamic. > >We should add your patch to what is already in the trunk. So we all agree. Thank you Adam and Florian for this thread, it just reminds me we are alive :-) @Dave, can you apply the last patch I sent named "acinclude_static.patch" concerning acinclude.m4 and ignore my first oneconcerning the configure.ac? Thanks. (note that if you don't find it, I can repost it). All of this should be done oncurrent trunk keeping Adam's work. Regards, Raphaël
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: