Re: subversion vs cvs

>>>>> "Marc" == Marc G Fournier <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
   Marc> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:   >> Which brings me to another question .. has anybody
considered  >> using subversion instead of CVS ?
 
   Marc> Why?  not that I'm for a chance from something that isn't   Marc> broken, but what advantages does subversion
giveus over   Marc> what we already have?
 

I've had plenty of pain with cvs in terms of directories not being
first-class etc .. but I don't really contribute to pgsql so you guys
probably don't have the same experience. 

I was just curious as it looks like eventually subversion (or arch :-)
will be an alternative to cvs. 

-- 
Pip-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh