Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
От | Sailesh Krishnamurthy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | mjqvf9uzcsh.fsf@drones.CS.Berkeley.EDU обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) ("Jonah H. Harris" <jharris@tvi.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Jonah" == Jonah H Harris <jharris@tvi.edu> writes: Jonah> Replying to the list as a whole: Jonah> If this is such a bad idea, why do other database systems Jonah> use it? As a businessperson myself, it doesn'tseem Jonah> logical to me that commercial database companies would Jonah> spend money on implementing this featureif it wouldn't be Jonah> used. Remember guys, I'm just trying to help. Systems like DB2 don't implement versioning schemes. As a result there is no need to worry about maintaining visibility in indexes. Index-only plans are thus viable as they require no change in the physical structure of the index and no overhead on update/delete/insert ops. I don't know about Oracle, which I gather is the only commercial system to have something like MVCC. -- Pip-pip Sailesh http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: