Re: Reverse Key Index
От | Thomas Kellerer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reverse Key Index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | mcn11a$lf8$1@ger.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reverse Key Index ("Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@tbz-pariv.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reverse Key Index
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Sven R. Kunze schrieb am 26.02.2015 um 12:04: > I just thought about btree indexes here mainly because they well-known and well-used in ORM frameworks. If your ORM framework needs to know about the internals of an index definition or even requires a certain index type, thenyou should ditch that ORM framework. Apart from indexes supporting business constraints (e.g. a unique index) neither the application nor the the ORM frameworkshould care about indexes at all. > does PostgreSQL support the concept of reverse key indexing as described here? The real question is: why do you think you need such an index? Do you have any performance problems with the existing BTree index? If yes, which problem exactly? Thomas
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: