Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3vfpzam6m.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Forcing pg_dump NOT to use "INSERT..." ("Jaskier" <jaskierbard@poczta.onet.pl>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, esoteric@3times25.net (Geoffrey) wrote: > I've got a client who is following my suggestion that they replace a > set of excel spreadsheets with a database solution. They are > looking at two proposals, postgresql solution or an Access solution. > The requirements will include vpn connectivity from one site to > another. It appears they will be going with the Access solution. > I've got concerns regarding this based on research I've done that > seems to indicate that Access, when used in a multi-user solution is > easily corrupted. Does anyone have any knowledge/experience with > such issues? If the application will be lightly loaded, it may not be a big deal. (After all, if the load is light enough, people might be able to do the job by filling in 3"x5" index cards and filing them in a box.) But if there are a bunch of users _actively_ updating the database, Access gets unacceptable pretty quickly. -- wm(X,Y):-write(X),write('@'),write(Y). wm('cbbrowne','acm.org'). http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/rdbms.html "Linux poses a real challenge for those with a taste for late-night hacking (and/or conversations with God)." -- Matt Welsh
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: