Re: Can postgresql be run in memory (like a memory resi
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can postgresql be run in memory (like a memory resi |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3u1esunlm.fsf@chvatal.cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can postgresql be run in memory (like a memory resi ("Malghan, Ravi" <rmalghan@btspartners.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can postgresql be run in memory (like a memory resi
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Quoth rmalghan@btspartners.com ("Malghan, Ravi"): > What I am trying to do is, I have multiple databases some of which > are frequently accessed. So I am trying to see if the one's which > are frequently accessed can be run as memory resident and others run > normally. I am thinking this might improve response times. In the ancient past, people would "set the sticky bit" on executable programs to force them to stay in memory; that idea has become obsolete what with larger memory sizes and more sophisticated memory management schemes in Unix variants. I think you're essentially trying to express the same idea here... The tables/databases that are frequently accessed should already be mostly in memory as a result of the way your OS caches data. It's not likely that there's anything that you can do "inside PostgreSQL" that would be helpful in this regard. -- output = ("cbbrowne" "@acm.org") http://cbbrowne.com/info/finances.html "Though the Chinese should adore APL, it's FORTRAN they put their money on." -- Alan Perlis
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: