Re: [Slony1-general] Re: [GENERAL] Slony-I 1.0.4 Released
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Slony1-general] Re: [GENERAL] Slony-I 1.0.4 Released |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3k6ti8b2p.fsf@knuth.knuth.cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Slony-I 1.0.4 Released (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
pgsql@bluepolka.net ("Ed L.") wrote: > Wow. First, thanks again for all your efforts, Jan. Second, I'm > disappointed to hear the slony author and lead developer is leaving > the slony leadership. When is that going to happen? And what does > that mean with respect to your future involvement in slony? In some respects, it's a healthy thing for there to be _some_ change that takes place. A project that is comprised of one person can pretty easily disappear if that one person steps away. Furthermore, one of the purported merits of open source is that it benefits from diverse involvement. A healthy OSS project sees changes coming in from _multiple_ people; from the diversity of people comes a diversity in points of view and in ideas of what can be added. That has already been the case with Slony-I. Furthermore, I don't see this leading to Jan "disappearing from Slony" at all. As one who 'groks the code well,' his wisdom will doubtless be drawn upon. (And since those paying his salary depend quite a lot on Slony-I, there's a certain amount of influence that could be brought to bear ;-).) He's trying to spend some time concentrating on yet another project that is also called Slony, namely Slony-II. The point of Slony-I was to provide an efficient way to bring a bunch of nodes into sync. Slony-II is to extend that further to support multimaster replication. It needs to start with databases that are in sync, ergo requiring starting with Slony-I. Others of us may be doing most of the "heavy lifting" to finish off features already contemplated for Slony-I, but I seriously doubt that means Jan will be completely uninvolved. There needs to be an interface between the phases, too. After all, there has to be some transformation to take a set of "Slony-I replicated" systems to then take them into "Slony-II mode." I'll bet that means that Slony-I will have to add some code to become "Slony-II-aware"... -- output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "acm.org") http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/ "Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent." -- J. M. Keynes
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: