Re: MySQL 5 comparison
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3k6qrguy4.fsf@knuth.knuth.cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL 5 comparison (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Clinging to sanity, jdavis-pgsql@empires.org (Jeff Davis) mumbled into her beard: > What caught my eye is the "strict mode". I wonder if they are going > to start promoting the reporting of errors? Right now MySQL seems to > have the philosophy that "if the input is wrong, it is better to do > something than nothing" (e.g. inserting Feb 31st into a date field). > > Perhaps they're trying to change that philosophy slowly with this > strict mode? You're assuming that there will be some incentive to use this new mode. Existing applications that are rife with dependancies on existing functionality will _break_ if they turn on "strict mode." And what value is there in fixing them? That doesn't add new functionality... No, I don't see a great deal of value in this, outside of _new_ commercial users that are paying for licenses... -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc")) http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/spreadsheets.html "A hack is a terrible thing to waste, please give to the implementation of your choice..." -- GJC
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: