Re: have you seen this?
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: have you seen this? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3ekp5ny8u.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: have you seen this? (Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>) |
Ответы |
Re: have you seen this?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
After a long battle with technology, dan@langille.org ("Dan Langille"), an earthling, wrote: > I have no problem directing people to the right tool for the job. > Sometimes that tool is PostgreSQL. Sometimes it is not. PostgreSQL > cannot please everyone all the time. It may well be a mistake to try to please all the people all the time. I think that was exactly what Tom Christiansen had in mind when he wrote: "Huh? Windows was designed to keep the idiots away from Unix so we could hack in peace. Let's not break that." -- Tom Christiansen Microsoft tries to market Windows as being "all things for all people;" much of its badness comes from that. "If Ada became the hot, in-language you would see a lot more bad code in Ada." -- Thaddeus L. Olczyk <olczyk@interaccess.com>, comp.lang.C++ If PostgreSQL became as popular as MS-Access, we'd find people doing hideous things with it. (Or, to be more precise, doing _even more hideous_ things ;-).) -- output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "ntlug.org") http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/emacs.html "Is your pencil Y2K certified? Do you know the possible effects if it isn't?"
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: