Re: adding missing FROM-clause
От | Edmund Bacon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: adding missing FROM-clause |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3d5z1gzp0.fsf@elb_lx.onesystem.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | adding missing FROM-clause ("C G" <csgcsg39@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
csgcsg39@hotmail.com ("C G") writes: > Dear All, > > I have a simple join query > > SELECT c1 FROM t1 > INNER JOIN > t2 ON t2.c2 = t1.c2 WHERE t3.c3= t2.c3; > > Which gives the expected result but I get the message > NOTICE: adding missing FROM-clause entry for table "t3" > > How do I get rid of this NOTICE, i.e. how should I construct my select > query. > SELECT c1 FROM t1, t2, t3 WHERE t2.c2 = t1.c2 AND t3.c3 = t2.c3; or SELECT c1 FROM t1 INNER JOIN t2 ON t2.c2 = t1.c2 INNER JOIN t3 ON T3.c3 = t2.c3; The above can also be written as SELECT c1 FROM t1 JOIN t2 USING(c2) JOIN t3 USING(c3); or even SELECT c1 FROM t1 NATURAL JOIN t2 NATURAL JOIN t3; This last might be problematic if t3 has a column named c1. Question: Is there any advantage to specifying USING() rather than ON? I know that if I do SELECT * from T1 JOIN t2 USING(col) then I only get 1 instance of col in the returned rows, but I'm wondering if there is any advantage to the planner by specifying either USING() or ON? -- Remove -42 for email
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: