XLog vs SSD [Was: Re: random write in xlog?]
От | James Cloos |
---|---|
Тема | XLog vs SSD [Was: Re: random write in xlog?] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3d3pcyqa9.fsf_-_@jhcloos.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: random write in xlog? (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: XLog vs SSD [Was: Re: random write in xlog?]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "JJ" == Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes: JJ> Anyway, the writes are logically sequentially, but not physically. JJ> If I remember correctly, it always writes out full blocks, even if JJ> the last part of the block has not yet been filled with new data. JJ> When the remainder gets filled, it then writes out the full block JJ> again, both the already written and the new part. What does that mean for use of a flash SSD for the xlog dir? Does the block writing mesh up well with the usage pattern a flash SSD needs to maximize lifespan? I'd love a dram ssd for pg_xlog and the journals for the other filesystems, but they cost too much. -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: