Re: Urgent: 10K or more connections
От | Doug McNaught |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Urgent: 10K or more connections |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3brvr250l.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Urgent: 10K or more connections (Francois Suter <dba@paragraf.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: Urgent: 10K or more connections
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Francois Suter <dba@paragraf.ch> writes: > Hi all, > > I have received a question via the Advocacy site and I am not knowledgeable > enough to answer. Can you help? > > The question is: can PostgreSQL handle between 10'000 and 40'000 > simultaneous connections? The persone asking the question has to choose > between Oracle and PostgreSQL, and my guess is that they would be relieved > if they could go with PostgreSQL. On a big enough system, sure. Each PG connection backend is a separate process, so you'd need to make sure the process table was big enough, open file and shared memory limits set high, etc. You'd want a really big machine, hopefully 64-bit like a Sparc or IA64, with lots of memory. But you'd want that for Oracle, too. You'd definitely want to spend a lot of time tuning and testing for that activity level, but again, you'd do that for Oracle too. -Doug
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: