Re: A multi CUP performance problem
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A multi CUP performance problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3brtazxon.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | A multi CUP performance problem (Li YueXin <liyuexin@neusoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when liyuexin@neusoft.com (Li YueXin) would write: > I found postgresql running on the multi CPU machine doesn't have > better performance than single CPU machine. Can you explain the > reason? And how to resolve the problem? The classic reason for this is that if your system is primarily I/O bound, adding extra CPUs is likely to have a relatively negligible effect on system performance. The far-and-away most enormous increase in transactions-per-second that people seem to see from hardware changes come from putting in a SCSI controller with large amounts of battery-backed cache. Additional disk drives tends to be #2. More memory also helps. The "problem" might very well be your expectation that adding CPUs would necessarily have much effect on performance. -- output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "cbbrowne.com") http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/emacs.html DSK: STAN.K; ML EXIT -- FILE NOT FOUND
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: