Re: cvs to git migration - keywords
От | Tim Landscheidt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cvs to git migration - keywords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3aaq3iaa9.fsf@passepartout.tim-landscheidt.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | cvs to git migration - keywords (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> 1) We can migrate the repository with the keywords, and then make one big >>> commit just after (or before, that doesn't make a difference) removing >>> them. In this case, backbranches and tags look exactly like they do >>> now, but it also means if you do "git diff" between old versions, the >>> keywords will show up there. >> +1 for #1. Changing history and the resulting possibility of becoming >> one's own grandfather always makes me nervous. > Yeah. One concrete problem with removing the $PostgreSQL$ lines is it > will affect line numbering everywhere. Yeah, it's only off-by-one, but > there could still be confusion. > [...] If not the whole line was removed, but only the "$PostgreSQL$" part, the numbering should stay the same. I guess it would otherwise be challenging to automatically not only delete the "$PostgreSQL$" line, but also leading and/or trailing empty (comment) lines, and not mess up. Tim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: