Re: PostGreSQL (sic) is mentioned

In the last exciting episode, trainor@uic.edu (Douglas Trainor) wrote:
>      Database Wars: Oracle vs. Microsoft
>          Vincent Ryan of www.newsfactor.com
>              http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nf/20031127/bs_nf/22767

A plausible outcome, absent of anticompetitive activity, would be for
Microsoft to get squeezed out in the middle.

After all, people _know_ that Oracle scales to "real big systems," and
the "free systems" are providing cheaper options than either Oracle or
Sybase^H^H^H^H^H^HMicrosoft SQL Server.  That would seem likely to put
pressure on anyone in the middle, which would be MSFT.
--
If this was helpful, <http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=cbbrowne> rate me
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/
"Survival in a world of words is best made, if at all, through clever
appeal to ambiguity." -- Robert Bolt