Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ?
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m33buzthx4.fsf@knuth.knuth.cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ? (Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul@argudo.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, jean-paul@argudo.org (Jean-Paul Argudo) transmitted: > How PostgreSQL can tell on the main website > " The world's most advanced open source database " > > ... *and* not defending Open source from its major threat: patents? > > This seems schyzophrenic to me. It seems perfectly reasonable to me that those are two quite separate matters, only one of which is forcibly relevant to PostgreSQL. I see no problem with people contributing to the EFF as well, or with them choosing to lobby against what may seem to be patent abuse of patents. But I _do_ have a problem with tying such to the PostgreSQL project when it certainly is possible that people may feel differently about the issue. Perhaps the EFF isn't the best organization for dealing with the European situation as it's somewhat US-centric; that's another reason to shy away... I am similarly not enthralled with situations where unions wind up collecting fees from members and then using them to sponsor other political movements. If members are interested, they can participate individually, which rather represents a stronger expression of interest. I have known cases where unions chose to donate to causes that some members distinctly _didn't_ support, and that leads to problems. For the situation to remain "fair," it would also be appropriate for political contributions to only have any sort of "tax deductibility" if given by individuals. Which would rather hamper donations being given in 'corporate' manners, whether by unions or by for-profit corporations. (And possibly one should s/individuals/voters/g ...) For an organization like PGDG that _isn't_ politically activist in nature (and that arguably isn't clearly defined for legal purposes) to steer clear of political activism doesn't seem particularly schizophrenic to me... -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="cbbrowne.com" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;; http://cbbrowne.com/info/slony.html Microsoft: The Scientology of Computing
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: