Re: effective_cache_size vs units
От | Benny Amorsen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m33b6ubm15.fsf@ursa.amorsen.dk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | effective_cache_size vs units (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: effective_cache_size vs units
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: TL> Personally I don't find the argument about "someday we might want TL> to support measurements in millibits" to be convincing at all, and TL> certainly it seems weaker than the argument that "units should be TL> case insensitive because everything else in this file is". The SQL TL> spec has to be considered a more relevant controlling precedent TL> for us than the SI units spec, and there are no case-sensitive TL> keywords in SQL. Units simply are not case sensitive. They are just a more or less random collection of preexisting symbols, because that was easier than drawing up entirely new ones. Not all are English letters, for one µ is not. If you upper case a text with units in, the units do not change with the rest of the text. /Benny
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: