Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
От | James Cloos |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m337f7nomd.fsf@jhcloos.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: TL> The question to be asked is whether there is still anybody out there TL> using float timestamps. Gentoo's ebuild includes: $(use_enable !pg_legacytimestamp integer-datetimes) \ meaning that by default --enable-integer-datetimes is passed to configure, but if the pg_legacytimestamp use flag is set, then --disable-integer-datetimes is passed instead. They document it as: <flag name="pg_legacytimestamp"> Use double precision floating-point numbers instead of 64-bit integers fortimestamp storage. </flag> Ie, w/o any kind of deprecation notice. I don't know how many (how few?) add pg_legacytimestamp to USE when merging postgresql. But it is still available as of 9.6 and also with their live build of git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git. -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: