Re: Doubt w.r.t vacuum
От | Doug McNaught |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Doubt w.r.t vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m31xware3d.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Doubt w.r.t vacuum ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
Ответы |
Re: Doubt w.r.t vacuum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> writes: > Hi, > > I was just wondering over it. This is for difference between vacuum full and > vacuum analyze. Can somebody enlighten, > > 1. IIRC vacuum recovers/reuses dead tuples generated from update but can not do > so for delete? Why? YDNRC. > 2. Vacuum full locks entire table, is it possible that it locks a > page at a time and deal with it. It will make vacuum full > non-blocking at the cost of letting it run for a longer time. Or is > it that the defragmentation algorithm needs more than a page? This I don't know, but I imagine that if what you suggest was easy to do it would have been done, and there would have been no need for two different kinds of VACUUM. -DOUG
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: