Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2zknsy8zo.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference
parameters by parameter name
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > rhaas=# CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION developer_lookup(id integer) > RETURNS text AS $$SELECT name FROM developer WHERE id = $1$$ LANGUAGE > sql STABLE; > > Now, when this person attempts to recreate this function on a > hypothetical version of PostgreSQL that thinks "id" is ambiguous, it > doesn't work. Unless we make it so that no such version ever exists. Meaning that the code works fine as is or using WHERE id = developer_lookup.id. AS id can't ever be the parameter in this case, you're just fine. Bearing in mind that $1 etc shortcuts still are available, I don't really see this qualification of parameter names with function names so big a problem that we should find a way to avoid it and risk breaking compatibility. Don't forget that any ambiguity here will mean *huge* migration costs. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: