Re: Need some help: attlen is pg_attributes gives a negative value.. .
От | Roland Roberts |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Need some help: attlen is pg_attributes gives a negative value.. . |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2wvlbatbz.fsf@tycho.rlent.pnet обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Need some help: attlen is pg_attributes gives a negative value.. . ("Klein, Robert" <rvklein@ober.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Need some help: attlen is pg_attributes gives a negative value.. .
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: Tom> "Klein, Robert" <rvklein@ober.com> writes: >> [ attlen for a char(n) field is -1 ] >> I know in previous versions the length as defined in the create >> table statement was given. Any ideas? Tom> Must have been quite a few versions back; attlen has been -1 Tom> for variable-length datatypes for as long as I've been paying Tom> attention. (Of course char(n) isn't *really* variable length, Tom> but it's treated that way so that the representation is the Tom> same as for varchar(n) and text.) When did this change? I haven't looked 6.5, but I thought 6.3 still has bpchar as fixed length and char(n) was blank padded whereas varchar was not. roland -- PGP Key ID: 66 BC 3B CD Roland B. Roberts, PhD Unix Software Solutions roberts@panix.com 76-15 113th Street, Apt 3B rbroberts@acm.org Forest Hills, NY 11375
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: