Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2sjvysctj.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes: >> I've spotted a comment that I think you missed updating. The schema >> given in the control file is now created in all cases rather than only >> when the extension is not relocatable, right? > > Hm, no, that logic is the same as before no? Well I had if (!control->relocatable && control->schema != NULL) And you have + else if (control->schema != NULL) So you're considering the schema option independently of the relocatable option, which is ok because you changed those options defaults and conflicts in the control file parsing. Only the comment needs adjusting. > I removed it --- it wasn't documented and I didn't see much point anyway > in a \d command that just duplicates a system view, especially a view > only usable by superusers. It used to not be a straight select from system view, and I wanted to offer something as simple as clicking a check box in pgadmin for people who want to see what's available and install it. But well, the system view is good enough now I guess, we're talking about DBA here after all. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: