Re: Where to load modules from?
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Where to load modules from? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2r4cky1gr.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Where to load modules from? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Where to load modules from?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> I think I'd prefer a GUC that allows specifying multiple directories >> that are searched in order to a single symlinked directory. > > Why? > > I ask because I have the opposite preference, based on the precedent of pg_xlog. I understand Andres preference, as it would allow a management somewhat comparable to PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH here. In an effort to reach consensus, what about having both, with the GUC being empty by default? That way you have a default per-cluster place where to stuff binaries to be loaded, and a GUC to manage finer settings if needs be. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: