Re: event trigger API documentation?
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: event trigger API documentation? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2ppxrluta.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: event trigger API documentation? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: event trigger API documentation?
Re: event trigger API documentation? Re: event trigger API documentation? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > You can be as much silent as you want in marketing materials (though > maybe Berkus will disagree with you about being silent there), but it is > not admissible to be silent in the documentation or pretend the feature > is not there. Whatever got committed, however small, needs to be > properly documented. Definitely, yes. The only questions in this thread are: - only docs or docs + contrib example? Tom said it's too late for the contrib example. - what about support for PLs other than C and PLpgSQL? It used to be part of the patch, and I don't understand well enough the development calendar to guess if I'm supposedto extract that from earlier patch or if that's too late for 9.3. I'm not sure what Peter's idea are wrt to thecalendar here. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: