Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2oc7wmov5.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers
Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: > As Tom pointed out, you can do the same with naming conventions by having scripts \i each other as appropriate. This is a deprecated idea, though. We're talking about the pg_execute_from_file() patch that has been applied, but without the pg_execute_sql_file() function. So that part is internal to the backend extension code and not available from SQL anymore. There's no consensus to publish a bakend \i like function. So there's no support for this upgrade script organizing you're promoting. Unless the consensus changes again (but a commit has been done). Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: