Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2mwxzb6ws.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> writes: > AFAICS pgqd currently uses libpq, so I think it would rather turn into > what I call a background worker, with a connection to Postgres shared > memory. I perfectly well see use cases (plural!) for those. > > What I'm questioning is the use for what I rather call "extra daemons", > that is, additional processes started by the postmaster without a > connection to Postgres shared memory (and thus without a database > connection). I totally missed the need to connect to shared memory to be able to connect to a database and query it. Can't we just link the bgworkder code to the client libpq library, just as plproxy is doing I believe? Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: