Re: transforms
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: transforms |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2li9rnsty.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: transforms (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: transforms
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > At run time, this will sort itself out, because all the required modules > will be loaded. The problem is when you create the "glue" extension and > haven't invoked any code from any of the dependent extension in the > session. Abstractly, the possible solutions are either not to check the > functions when the extension is created (possibly settable by a flag) or > to somehow force a load of all dependent extensions when the new > extension is created. (I say extension here even though dynamically > loadable modules are attached to functions, which makes this even more > confusing.) I think CREATE EXTENSION should be LOADing all distinct modules referenced from all required extensions functions. It does sound easy enough to code, and I can't imagine why we would want to not do that. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: