Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2li22bkuj.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I think we were going to try to group the extensions into categories > (debugging tools, demonstration code, data types, etc.) and maybe > encourage packagers to put the debugging tools in the same OS package > as the core server. But Tom was not supportive, and he was at the > time the packager for Red Hat, so it didn't seem like we were going to > get to far with it. My understanding is that we wanted to promote some extensions as being "core extensions" and change the directory and documentation layout to encourage packagers to rethink they work. And my understanding of Tom's reaction is that he didn't believe the source directory layout has anything to do with the packaging problem, we should just document the extensions we want installed by default and packagers will know to follow us there. Still, *something* needs to be done here. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: