Re: PL/java?
От | Gunnar Rønning |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/java? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2g0a1zu4v.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/java? (merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/java?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
* merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote: | | If you'd just stop saying things that can't be backed up, I wouldn't | have to keep responding. ;-) | Where is your proof that mod_perl is "slower than most any j2ee | application"? I don't like to generalize either. I've been on two projects where we have replaced Perl applications with Java applications. The first one was a content management system and the second was an online dating application(like match.com). In both cases we ended up with Java applications that performed better than the Perl applications. The reasons ? - Maybe it was because our Java developers were better than our Perl developers. - Maybe we had learned something the second time implementing the application. Better architecture, system design, etc. - Maybe Java was better suited for the actual applications. In the end there is however no proof to claim that Java applications are faster than mod_perl applications. But having Java in the PgSQL backend would be nice for some, regardless of how well Java compares to Perl. -- Gunnar Rønning - gunnar@polygnosis.com Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: