* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
|
| Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= <gunnar@polygnosis.com> writes:
| > But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that works
| > nicely and I think including the ant binaries(around 500k) would be the
| > best solution here.
|
| 500k of binaries? You just lost the argument. That's not an acceptable
| amount of overhead to add to the Postgres distribution.
Maybe another reason to look into less monolithic approaches. Both in terms
of project distribution and release cycles, I still think a decoupling the
JDBC interface from the main distribution is a good idea ;-)
--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar@polygnosis.com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/