Re: Progress, anything in common with PostgreSQl besides clever name?
От | Gunnar Rønning |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Progress, anything in common with PostgreSQl besides clever name? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2g087hf5i.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Progress, anything in common with PostgreSQl besides clever name? (Dave Smith <dave.smith@candata.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
* Dave Smith <dave.smith@candata.com> wrote: | | Progress is a 4gl database. try www.progress.com Well, they have a SQL frontend as well. We used this one last year because the consultants responsible for implementation of the project came from Progress. Apptivity application server on top Progress database was a total disaster at that time, support bad and not responsive(they didn't get the red flag when I started sending backtraces from coredumps and suggesting what the problems might be...). Anyway we migrated away from that horrible platform, first we converted the Apptivity application and datamodel to pgsql. Big win, no more random crashes. Only problem left how to get rid of memory leaks in Apptivity, well we couldn't so we dumped it and went with a lightweight WebMacro solution that served us a lot better. PostgreSQL just runs, WebMacro on Apache just runs, and I don't get wakeup calls in the middle of the night anymore ;-) Frustrated, Gunnar -- Gunnar Rønning - gunnar@polygnosis.com Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: