Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2fw99sx4y.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I'd really like to not have to change the catalog again in every > patch, because if we do that then we are just saying we're going to > rewrite this patch completely every time we want to add a new feature, > which kind of defeats the purpose IMHO. Fair enough. > So let's try to hammer something out now. The obvious thing that > occurs to me is to have a column in the catalog that is a 2-D array of > text, with the first element of each array being something like "tag" > or "subtag" (i.e. event_trigger_variable) and the remaining array > elements being a list of legal values. That is: > > WHEN thingy IN thingy IN ('item1', 'item2') AND otherthingy IN ('foo', 'bar') > > would be represented as this array: > > {{thingy,item1,item2},{otherthingy,foo,bar}} > > This would allow us to support 0 or more WHERE clauses, each of the > form "thing IN (value1, value2, ...)". Is that general enough for > every use case that you can foresee, or do we need more? Given what I foresee, simply having another columns in there named evtstags with the exact same content as evttags would be the simplest and most natural implementation, really. I don't foresee more generic needs here, unless you can convince me that we need both a. a full stack of arbitrarily nested commands and b. a way to match and target any level of that stack. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: