Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE patch v1
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE patch v1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2d3obkvq4.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE patch v1 (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: > The syntax by itself does nothing, but the underlying capability gives > users: Ok, now I understand that the syntax you proposed was a shortcut for an I-want-it-all request :) > - The ability to have versions of software on different databases on > the same system. > > - The ability to do deterministic upgrades, rather than just, "upgrade > me to the latest, which may be buggy and/or slow things down to > avoid a problem I know I don't have." Both depends on a filesystem organization rework. > I am not saying that this is a show-stopper. I *am* saying that > multiple concurrent versions and deterministic upgrades are common > enough requests that you shouldn't do things that would prevent those > in the future. Would it be useful to have the syntax support in 9.1 already, but which would only check that the asked-of new version (and current version) are the one currently available (and installed), and ERROR out otherwise? I think that syntax-and-check is still doable for 9.1, if there's a will to get there. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: