Re: schema support, was Package support for Postgres
От | Gunnar Rønning |
---|---|
Тема | Re: schema support, was Package support for Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2bsj3k7dx.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: schema support, was Package support for Postgres (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: schema support, was Package support for Postgres
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: | | > resources as well that should not conflict with other packages, like temp | > tables or such. It then seems to me that using schemas can solve everything | > that packages do and more ? | | Yeah. I am wondering whether we couldn't support Oracle-style packages | as a thin layer of syntactic sugar on top of schemas. I am concerned | about the prospect that "foo.bar" might mean either "object bar in | schema foo" or "object bar in package foo". Agreed, and in Sybase you may declare a procedure in a schema(or database which is the Sybase term). If you want it global you declare it in the "master" schema. -- Gunnar Rønning - gunnar@polygnosis.com Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: