Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE; |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2bp4tz1t7.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE; ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;
Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE; |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: > You keep making extension authors have to do more work. I keep trying > to make it so they can do less. We want the barrier to be as low as > possible, which means a lot of DRY. Make it *possible* to do more > complicated things, but don't *require* it. Sorry, imposing that - ain't part of the version number string won't make any impression on me as far as getting simple is concerned. Go find a single debian package not having - in its version number, and that's a native software (developed to build debian). For details, see the following, then explain me how RPM is so differently simple, and then why I should care. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version So really, using %v to say "put the current version number here" does not seem like a problem for me, it allows me not to have to think about *any* files naming rules nor version numbering scheme. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: