Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
| От | Dimitri Fontaine |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Extensions, this time with a patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m2aam80zlg.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Extensions, this time with a patch ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: > Might I suggest instead a META.json file like PGXN requires? Here's a > simple example: I don't see what it buys us in this very context. The main thing here to realize is that I wrote about no code to parse the control file. I don't think the extension patch should depend on the JSON-in-core patch. Now, once we have JSON and before the release, I guess given a good reason to have much more complex configuration files that don't look at all like postgresql.conf, we could revisit. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: