Re: Future of our regular expression code
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Future of our regular expression code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2aa4fg2ie.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Future of our regular expression code (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Future of our regular expression code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Yeah ... if you *don't* know the difference between a DFA and an NFA, > you're likely to find yourself in over your head. Having said that, So, here's a paper I found very nice to get started into this subject: http://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html If anyone's interested into becoming our PostgreSQL regexp hero and still needs a good kicker, I would recommend starting here :) I see this paper mention the regexp code from Plan9, which supports both UTF8 and other muti-byte encodings, and is released as a library under the MIT licence: http://swtch.com/plan9port/unix/ Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: