Re: Command Triggers, v16
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Command Triggers, v16 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2aa3hle5i.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Command Triggers, v16 (Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Command Triggers, v16
Re: Command Triggers, v16 Re: Command Triggers, v16 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for testing this new version (again). A quick answer now, I'll send another patch tomorrow. Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> writes: > I don’t understand how functions can return a type of “command > trigger”. This certainly works, but I’ve never seen a type consisting > of more than one word. Could you explain this for me? This is also I tricked that in the grammar, the type is called cmdtrigger but I though it wouldn't be a good choice for the SQL statement. > at odds with the error message in src/backend/commands/cmdtrigger.c: > > errmsg("function \"%s\" must return type \"trigger\"", I realized I needed another trigger like data type after I had worked this message, I need to get back on it, thanks. > At this moment in time, CTAS is still outstanding. Is the plan to try > to get that in for this release, or as an enhancement in 9.3? The plan is to get CTAS as a utility command in 9.2 then update the command trigger patch to benefit from the new situation. We've been wondering about making its own commit fest entry for that patch, it's now clear in my mind, that needs to happen. Stay tuned, follow up email due tomorrow. -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: