Re: walreceiver fallback_application_name
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: walreceiver fallback_application_name |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m27he4bmec.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: walreceiver fallback_application_name (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: walreceiver fallback_application_name
Re: walreceiver fallback_application_name |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > Is "walreceiver" something that "the average DBA" is going to realize > what it is? Perhaps go for something like "replication slave"? I think walreceiver is very good here, and the user is already confronted to such phrasing. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-MAX-WAL-SENDERS Also, we're about to extend the technique usage in some other places such as integrated base backup facility and default archiving solution, so let's talk about what it's doing, not what for. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: