Re: License question
| От | Gunnar Rønning |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: License question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m2664yvlqd.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | License question (Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com> wrote: | We're not charging SPECIFICALLY for PostgreSQL, but for a complete, working | setup... Is this in conformance with the PostgreSQL license...? Disclaimer : I'm not a lawyer. Yes, this is perfectly legal with the PostgreSQL license. You could even charge for the source code, without having done any modifications. If you do modifications you can charge for the end product without releasing source code. That is the big difference between BSD style licenses such as the PostgreSQL license and GPL licenses such as the one for Linux. In both cases you are allowed to charge for your product, but with the latter license you would have to make the source code available for anybody you distribute your product to. This is not a requirement with BSD style licenses. -- Gunnar Rønning - gunnar@polygnosis.com Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: