Re: Ant installation (and other) issues!
| От | Gunnar Rønning |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Ant installation (and other) issues! |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m24rorqqp2.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Ant installation (and other) issues! (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Ant installation (and other) issues!
|
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
* Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: | | Per-Olof Norén writes: | | > The Ant build system is making its way to be a "de facto" standard for building java applications as | > it is built for the purpose. | | Make as been the standard for building any application for about 30 years. | GNU-style configure has been the standard for configuration management for | about 10 years. Windows NT and Visual Basic have been the standard for | enterprise computing for 5 years. Thank you very much. ;-) I can't your point or the joke, please enlighten me ;-) make is AFAIK the most common build program, but that doesn't mean that the tool is ideal everywhere. Progress is possible you know, evolutionary or revolutionary. GNU Make has been evolutionary, Ant is revolutionary. configure management is certainly a lot more than configure. I would argue that CVS is the most important configuration management tool, but the issue is of course broader. But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that works nicely and I think including the ant binaries(around 500k) would be the best solution here. -- Gunnar Rønning - gunnar@polygnosis.com Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: