Re: My brain hurts - update field based on value of another table's field
От | merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: My brain hurts - update field based on value of another table's field |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m1n13gqr9e.fsf@halfdome.holdit.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | My brain hurts - update field based on value of another table's field ("Pat M" <pmeloy@removethispart.home.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "Pat" == Pat M <pmeloy@removethispart.home.com> writes: Pat> I know I can join things together in queries, avoiding all this, Pat> but it gets real confusing trying to join 12 tables, and Pat> slow... I want to be able to get the area from the buildings Pat> table and not have to join three tables just to find out what Pat> area it belongs to. Unless someone knows an easier way than Pat> select area_name from areas,sites,buildings where Pat> area_id=site_area and site_id=building_id and building_id=1; Pat> Speed and easy queries are my focus, not disk space or ram Pat> savings. Just build a view that wraps that part of the join, and map updates on that view back to the consituent tables (or just forbid writes to those tables). Then you can construct queries as if those one or two extra columns were part of that table, and they'll never get out of sync. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: